🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters praising your advice on growing your business? Do recruiters reaching out to explore collaborations?

If not, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals participated in an organized professional network test this week after popular discussions suggested that changing their profile gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they called "masculine-oriented" language - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system prioritizes men who use online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which posts are shown to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how posts are received.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her reach decline substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with similar "assertive" style

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - brief and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after seven days, stating "Every day I persisted, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all testers encountered positive outcomes. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical posts by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and distribute posts based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."